Wallabies superstar Israel Folau reportedly rejected a peace offering of nearly $1 million to walk away from Rugby Australia as the bitter code of conduct hearing continues in Sydney today.
The Sunday Telegraph revealed that RA made the last-ditch offer to Folau and his legal team earlier this week, hoping to avoid the hearing, which started on Saturday and will continue today, with a decision not expected until midway through next week.
The secret late settlement offer suggests RA may be seriously concerned about losing their battle against the Wallabies star, who signed a four-year, $4 million contract extension in February.
Wallabies coach Michael Cheika gave evidence on Saturday as Folau challenged RA’s intention to tear up his lucrative contract over homophobic comments.
Live stream the 2019 Vodafone Super Rugby on KAYO SPORTS. Every game of every round live & anytime in HD and ad-break free during play. Get your 14 day free trial >
The devoutly religious fullback was informed last month of plans to terminate his deal after he posted on social media that “hell awaits” gay people.
It followed a similar row last year, when he escaped with a warning.
This time RA and the NSW Rugby Union made clear they have had enough, issuing him with a “high-level” breach notice under the player code of conduct.
Super Rugby’s all-time record try scorer and one of the sport’s highest-profile players opted to challenge it through a tribunal, with experts warning of a protracted legal battle regardless of the outcome.
Neither Folau nor RA chief Raelene Castle commented to the waiting media ahead of the hearing in Sydney on Saturday.
“Israel Folau, Raelene Castle and Michael Cheika attended the hearing and provided oral evidence to the panel at Rugby Australia headquarters in Sydney today,” RA said in a brief statement.
“It is not expected that any further witnesses will be called to provide evidence on Sunday.”
Submissions and evidence were heard behind closed doors by a three-member panel chaired by John West, an employment law expert and senior counsel.
It will decide what punishment, if any, is appropriate — ranging from a fine to a suspension, or the sack.
Either way, RA said a decision was not expected this weekend.
Legal experts said the case would almost certainly go to an appeal whichever way it went, and then potentially to the courts for a lengthy, and costly, fight that could set a precedent for how much control sporting bodies have over athletes’ public pronouncements.
NEW PODCAST! Rod Kafer joins the crew to discuss the end of his stint working for Rugby Australia and the Israel Folau code of conduct hearing
Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes by CLICKING HERE
‘LONG WAY TO RUN’
Giuseppe Carabetta, an employment law expert at the University of Sydney’s Business School, described the case as a “perfect storm of conflicting religious, corporate sponsorship and moral issues.”
“The Folau case may eventually involve not only RA’s code of conduct but also aspects of contract law, anti-discrimination laws and employee rights under the Fair Work Act,” said Carabetta.
“The case may well have a very long way to run.”
Folau was set to argue that RA did not include a specific social media clause in the four-year contract he signed in February and his posts were merely passages from the Bible and not directly his words.
The governing body was expected to counter that even if there was no clause, he seriously breached its broader code of conduct policy and its inclusion policy.
The player was likely to argue that rugby’s “inclusion for all” should also take into account strong religious beliefs.
The controversy has overshadowed Australia’s World Cup preparations, with Cheika vowing not to pick Folau again after his “disrespectful” comments.
“When you play in the gold jersey we represent everyone in Australia, everyone,” Cheika said after the row exploded.
“Everyone that is out there supporting us, we don’t pick and choose.”
Others in the Wallabies camp have also criticised Folau but some, particularly from Pacific Islands backgrounds, have reportedly been angered because they feel their religion is under attack.